re-update) I would say, Obama is much closer to Bush in its keen compassion to protect Americans&the world of peace as a form of caring/protecting people's quality life and human rights.

What Bush provided the Americans were the stable governance for the ordinary people's everyday life by strengthening job programs for youth who can not find their doors to start carriers, the broaden the application of medicare for the elderly in relation to gain medicine prescriptions from doctors with less time and less cost. Bush also attempted, and unfortunately failed, to provide minimum pension for everyone no matter how short period s/he could have been working and paying the pension fees by reducing pension money to be paid to the middle class or upper class people. Bush also attempted, and again unfortunately failed though, to allow many peaceful, appropriate illegal immigrants to apply for American citizen. Bush had been honestly equal or trying to equally provide his governance to anyone no matter how his/her colour of skin,religion, race or educational backgrounds. What he failed in cutting and public education services in each region is party the consequences from what certain people intended to make the quality and level of education to be fairly even in each region. But is was not proper way of governance. The quality and level of education should be raised by each region/school where each student and parents are being long familiar with. The number of schools cannot be reduced but the quality and level should be raised by putting more endevours with better teaching skills/teaching materials, not reducing the number of schools. The Bush tax incentives for the riches were functioned only at the era when people could have been using their money to buy the products in the normal markets where the money spent are to be circulated back into the jobs, tax revenues from companies, and into the public budget for social security/welfare/education to increase stable dispensable income for the power of consumption to be circulated by everyone's ordinal everyday consumption for goods. But such stimulation would not work anymore. Now, even if the incentives for the richest will be continued, those can not be circulated from the richest to the poorest via the markets, the taxation and the proper governance because the money would be highly probably only circulating within certain circle of consumption of minerals, water resources, or some other valuable property rights related things but ordinary goods/products. And, that is why, it is apparent for anyone that the Romney 20% tax cut for everyone including for the richest would end up another way of tax incentives for the richest,increase the gaps along with the favored tax rates for the richest, and would not have any effective impact or stimuli to boost economy and jobs. About what Romney "tax cuts" means, there's a youtube where Clinton gave convincing and simple explanation. Please see this. Bush cares for, equally, every veterans not only for the welfare but also for raising/caring each veteran's and for employing of the spirit of the national security. Bush, all in all, cares for Americans' quality of life and human rights, quality of economy, quality of security, and quality of the peace and human rights of the world as the president of united states of America. The reason why Bush could have created jobs more is because Bush could have increased dispensable income of many not only via taxation but also small changes in medicare system. Not because of the tax incentives for the richest. In this context, Obama has continued carrying out the medicare/medicaid system which definitely reduce the medical cost for the people in need which definitely increase their dispensable income to buy the milk, bread, vegetables and books to learn skills for jobs more. Many have been misunderstood about the "compulsory" factor in Obama medicare/medicaid which is, however, normally seen in Japan. Everyone takes responsibility to pay the compulsory medicare fee for all to run the medicare/medicaid system. It is fair and secure for everyone to run such system protecting everyone's rights to go and have the best medical therapies for their health. Anyone could be the one who cannot be afford to buy expensive medical insurance by himself/herself. That is just a system of caring each other with the cost each can pay at each stage. Caring others in medicare/medicaid would definitely build secure, stable, safe and equal society to allow anyone/any family to buy glossaries, stationary, clothes and etc. that would definitely circulate into market and small&big companies to hire more and pay more revenue depending on the amount such people in need to have chances to increase their dispensable income by the governance/medicare/medicaid, tax exemption or tax benefits. Obama Medicare/Medicaid with your medicare payments will bring more jobs in your cities, your towns, your families and relatives and more income in your hands. Obama cares veterans more than Romney, Obama cares everyone in the United States of America no matter how the colour of the skin, no matter how his/her belief and religion is. If you would like to see Bush-like Presidency again for everyone including veterans and small shop owners in the office, it could not be materialized by Romney who would work only for companies and spend more for arm industries not for solders themselves. Bush has had reduced spending in arm industries but maintained budget for the solders and veterans. Bush knows well about what is the core of the national security and what would damage the national budget most. Too much expanded arm industry would damage the national budget to the extend which requires to start conflicts or to have difficulties to exit from conflicts. Bush showed his ability not to expand arm industry and to finish the intervene as possible as quick and cheap. But problem was the terror attacks on allies which had not been expected to be occurred against the allies that liberated the nation Iraq from the dictator Saddam Hussein after almost 14 yrs of economic sanctions against the long violence dictatorship oriented governance Saddam Hussein where no election, including any type of elections or votes, was held for 50 yrs (utterly different situation to which the Syria and the Assad Syrian government that have been trapped and patient with condemnation and inner conflicts without specific reasons). Back to the topic what I am writing here. And I remember that Bush was the president to try not to make air planes and not to sell air planes to foreign countries in order to cut spending, to cut the risk of increases of the reason to start war or to extend unnecessary conflicts and, to avoid the risk any foreign nations start war/terrorism against US with arms and bombs US sold to the foreign nations. Bush is/was clever as Clinton is/was. About spending for security, it contrasts Obama and Romney. According to NYT,Romney plans to spend additional 2 trillion more. Romney planed to spednd more especially for building submarines while retaining the cutting of the number of solders.URL:NYTimes: Romney’s Proposal for More Military Ships Draws Skepticism http://nyti.ms/RRwTw0 It is simply enough to tell about which is cleverer in terms of national security and the nature of spending. Spending budget for arm industries are, I always write this in Japanese, is the most ineffective public spending because arm industries won't pay back to nation unless the arms cannot be sold, unless any conflicts are occurred, unless any situation where a nation needs to kill people raises, which are all to be avoided or not to be occurred. Arm industries are,therefore, the business not to be invested too much in the first place. Even public spending into arm industry may create jobs in a relatively short time but from a longer term point of view, spending budget to arm industries are not worth to put due to its unsustainable nature as business to produce/sell weapons, and its small impact on economy and on employment. Obama will continue supporting for public endeavours to widen the scope of the people who can buy the goods/products/services to the extent which sustains companies to run their business,to hire the people and to pay proper tax without loopholes or unreasonably politically "reduction" for the companies. Obama will reduce the burdens put on the middle class income tax. Obama also reduces the small shop owners' income tax with certain job incentives to hire the people. (Pls, see the following government paper: "Creating an Economy Built to Last", by National Economic Councile, May, 2012, URL:http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/small_business_report_05_16_12.pdf) Romney is the worst candidate in its interests setting on the property rights and land property based values to borrow more money for more "business" to buy out other valuable companies' land properties to keep such circulation of money. Romney is not, in the first place, an appropriate candidate for president who needs to worry about dispensable income and consumers ability to buy and the budgeting to sustain the dispensable income of every americans as possible as the president can. Romney is a "business man" but is the one who does not need to worry about dispensable income of every american, about real economy status of the united states of America. What Romney worry about is the means to reduce taxation on the businessmen/companies dealing with land/mineral property rights/assets values the companies, like those Romney owned ones, to sell and to borrow money to/from someone seeks to gain the control of such valuable mineral/oil related property rights every minute. If you are interested in Obama's promises to you, please check the following Obama pagesthose of Bush's or Clinton's . Obama's promises are much closer,compared with Romney, to Bush&Clinton in its honestly keen to the peace without arms&deaths, to quality of ppl's lives&protection of safety&quality of lives! about obama's policy and promises please see the following URLs: http://www.barackobama.com/plans/foreign-policy?source=socnet_20121022_BO_FB_FOREIGN_POLICY_PLANS_SIGNON&utm_medium=fb&utm_source=bo_fb&utm_campaign=socnet_20121022_BO_FB_FOREIGN_POLICY_PLANS_SIGNON http://www.facebook.com/barackobama?ref=stream

And I would say, Obama is much closer to Bush in its keeness in protecting Americans&the world of peace as caring every people in the world as possible he can.

What Bush provided the Americans were the stable governance for the ordinary people's everyday life by strengthening job programs for youth who can not find their doors to start carriers, the broaden the application of medicare for the elderly in relation to gain medicine prescriptions from doctors with less time and less cost. Bush also attempted, and unfortunately failed, to provide minimum pension for everyone no matter how short period s/he could have been working and paying the pension fees by reducing pension money to be paid to the middle class or upper class people. Bush also attempted, and again unfortunately failed though, to allow many peaceful, appropriate illegal immigrants to apply for American citizen. Bush had been honestly equal or trying to equally provide his governance to anyone no matter how his/her colour of skin,religion, race or educational backgrounds. What he failed in cutting and public education services in each region is party the consequences from what certain people intended to make the quality and level of education to be fairly even in each region. But is was not proper way of governance. The quality and level of education should be raised by each region/school where each student and parents are being long familiar with. The number of schools cannot be reduced but the quality and level should be raised by putting more endevours with better teaching skills/teaching materials, not reducing the number of schools. The Bush tax incentives for the riches were only functioned only at the era when people could have been using their money to buy in the normal market to be circulated back into the jobs, tax revenue from companies, and again the public social security/welfare/education to increase stable dispensable income for the power of consumption to be circulated. Not anymore. Now, the incentives have been gone to something in the market to be circulated from the richest to the poorest in the taxation and the proper governance. Now, no matter how incentive tax had been increased, it would not have much economic impact coz the money would go for something other but the products or normal services. About what Romney "tax cuts" means, there's a youtube where Clinton gave convincing and simple explanation. Please see this. Bush cares for, equally, every veterans not only for the welfare but also for raising/caring each veteran's and for employing of the spirit of the national security. Bush, all in all, cares for Americans' quality of life and human rights, quality of economy, quality of security, and quality of the peace and human rights of the world as the president of united states of America. The reason why Bush could have made jobs more is because Bush could have increase dispensable income not only via taxation but also small changes in medicare system and other ways. Not because of the tax incentives for the richest. In this context, Obama has continued carrying out the medicare/medicaid system which definitely reduce the medical cost for the people in need which definitely increase their dispensable income to buy the milk, bread, vegetables and books to learn skills for jobs more. Many have been misunderstood about the "compulsory" factor in Obama medicare/medicaid which is, however, normally seen in Japan. Everyone takes responsibility to pay the compulsory medicare fee for all to run the medicare/medicaid system. It is fair and secure for everyone to run such system protecting everyone's rights to go and have the best medical therapies for their health. Anyone could be the one who cannot be afford to buy expensive medical insurance by himself/herself. That is just a system of caring each other with the cost each can pay at each stage. Caring others in medicare/medicaid would definitely build secure, stable, safe and equal society to allow anyone/any family to buy glossaries, stationary, clothes and etc. that would definitely circulate into market and small&big companies to hire more and pay more revenue depending on the amount such people in need to have chances to increase their dispensable income by the governance/medicare/medicaid, tax exemption or tax benefits. Obama Medicare/Medicaid with your medicare payments will bring more jobs in your cities, your towns, your families and relatives and more income in your hands. Obama cares veterans more than Romney, Obama cares everyone in the United States of America no matter how the colour of the skin, no matter how his/her belief and religion is. If you would like to see Bush-like Presidency again for everyone including veterans and small shop owners in the office, it could not be materialized by Romney who would work only for companies - levaiathan who wants to demolish/reduce taxation on companies/gang organizations by making more loopholes and to demolish every cent of budget spending for the people but the companies/livaiathan gangs' "consultants/brokers". Leviathan is also obvious in Romney whose plan of spending in national security to built more ships while cutting budget for veterans. Leviathan normally won't spend public money much for the people but for the arm industries probably because choosing and ordering arms is directly/indirectly related to certain interests of politicians who decide. For example, as typical way of Leviathan. According to NYT,Romney plans to spend additional 2 trillion more. Romney planed to spednd more especially for building submarines while retaining the cutting of the number of solders.URL:NYTimes: Romney’s Proposal for More Military Ships Draws Skepticism http://nyti.ms/RRwTw0 Obama has been and will keep fighting against Levaiathan. Leviathan is anarchism violence/ganging oriented fundamentalism to aim at materialising a world without any rules,monetary system,taxation and governance caring for those in need or those in weakness. Leviathan is seeking to build a world where only property/arm "rich",say gangs, can survive. Leviathan attacks,then,public governance/taxation on companies (not on individuals),and opposes to economy/circulation of money from the companies/the richest to the poorest via governance and social welfare protecting everyone's human rights and quality of life. Leviathan targets not only socialism,communism but monetary system,banking, Obama will continue supporting for public endeavours to widen the scope of the people who can buy the goods/products/services to the extent which sustains companies to run their business,to hire the people and to pay proper tax without loopholes or unreasonably politically "reduction" for the companies. Obama will reduce the burdens put on the middle class income tax. Obama also reduces the small shop owners' income tax especially with certain job incentives to hire the people. Romney cannot be, what so ever, the one who can stop the above. Rather, Romney is the part of the above to squeeze the people to collect tax money from the people especially those in need in order to reduce taxation on companies and to broaden the loopholes for the companies to circulate money and jobs only within the circle of levaiathan who commits economic crimes by making more loopholes for companies. Tax cuts for companies is the core policy Romney can develop if he can be a president, which would not benefit anyone but himself and such. About national security, what Romney prioritizes is not the peace, the quality and safety of national solders and national care for veterans. It is, again, Obama, who cares Veterans and the quality of life and human rights of national solders of the united states of America. That is so apparent for anyone of Americans that it is Obama who can clearly make solders secured enough to fight against any enemies to the people of the united states of America, the national interests, and the peace and stability of the nation and the world. Problem is not referring, but the above - and the spy satellites - which have been brain washing people to choose only levaiathan candidates who want to make people hate own gov't unless the gov't is run by levaiathan politicians who seek to make people conflict each other and to kill each other or abondon the people by not using budget for the people but the companies to demolish national governance run via taxation to circulate money to the people in need to broaden the scope of consumers. Romney is the worst candidate in its interests setting on the property rights and land property based values to borrow more money for more "business" to buy out other valuable companies' land properties to keep such circulation of money. Romney is not, in the first place, an appropriate candidate for president who needs to worry about dispensable income and consumers ability to buy and the budgeting to sustain the dispensable income of every americans as possible as the president can. Romney is a "business man" but is the one who does not need to worry about dispensable income of every american, about real economy status of the united states of America. What Romney worry about is the means to reduce taxation on the businessmen/companies dealing with land/mineral property rights/assets values the companies, like those Romney owned ones, to sell and to borrow money to/from someone seeks to gain the control of such valuable mineral/oil related property rights every minute. If you are interested in Obama's promises to you, please check the following Obama pagesthose of Bush's or Clinton's . Obama's promises are much closer,compared with Romney, to Bush&Clinton in its honestly keen to the peace without arms&deaths, to quality of ppl's lives&protection of safety&quality of lives! about obama's policy and promises please see the following URLs: http://www.barackobama.com/plans/foreign-policy?source=socnet_20121022_BO_FB_FOREIGN_POLICY_PLANS_SIGNON&utm_medium=fb&utm_source=bo_fb&utm_campaign=socnet_20121022_BO_FB_FOREIGN_POLICY_PLANS_SIGNON http://www.facebook.com/barackobama?ref=stream

Obama is doing possibly thinkable very best. And,Romney is not Bush. Or remember, even Bush could not handle the world of terror after the success of Iraqi intervention.

Honestly saying, Romney could be a president in 70s. Honestly, Romney has only simple ideas which seem to have worked in much simpler world. Romney's foreign policy is so shmple to show off if any country won't abmit International society's advice, the US would show its power as police. It was successfully implimented in the Iraqi intervention to save Iraqi people/civilians from the deadriest violent dictatorship of Saddam Hussein. Now, the rightous of America does seem to be difficult to tell&even to implement. Look, the middle-east, it seems to be something which no one can handle with.But it is not because of Obama but because of far-right very specifically conbatant, in its nature due to very wierdly nationalism/Xonophobia oriented&brain washing oriented fundamentalists in the disguise of Sunni. Why I tell you this is because Romney's foreign policy is not leading to any peace but to do more worsen by showing off how he can help such fundamentalists. Romney clealy promised to bomb on Iran just because it is not a nation/gov't to accept Muslim Brotherhood which is the origine of Jihaad/al-Qaeda, is a 'sort of sunni' but actually 'sunni based(disguised)violent fundamentalism 'group' milita. Everyoen need to realize that what 'bomb on Iran' means.'Bomb on Iran' is not merely a tactics to attract Israel support to Romney but is a promise to kill anyone all of the region where fundamentalism Muslim Brother hood cannot penentrate.Romney's 'Bomb on Iran' does mean a continued 'efforts' to kill every place if the place is opposing to accept Muslim Brotherhoods' ''charity(fraud to attract people with 'free''food&medicine to enforce poorest/hugriest people to declare to become a nationalist for MBH fundamentalism/anti-immigrants conbatant pre-army)''. Syria,Iran,Lebanon are those of such. It is NOT of an issue of ideology but rather a world invasion by using their own people to take every valuable from every nation/region in the disguise of Islamist fundamentalism which is actually a 'global' land occupation intending to rob property/mineral/water source rights with no money.If people kill their own gov't that protect the people's rights/safety/goods/property, then,who would take the property?The answer is 'global'far-rights such as Spain/Italy with huge shareholders from Swiss/Germany/Austraria/Australia/Canada/US/Korea/Taiwan etc. Romney is NOT Bush.If Bush were in the position of Obama, Bush would not promise 'bomb on Iran'.Coz,Iran is not the cause of the middle-east mess,he probably knows. It is Muslim Brotherhood the world need to stop but it is not possible to stop Muslim Brotherhood by arms,probably.People are too much brain washed in the context of fundamentalitic conbatant far-right nationalism/violent killings as something which, as if, fulfilled their demands, actually MBH just exploits the people to crash own nation/own gov't only for MBH's robbing of their rights&properties/interests of the people, though. Romeny won't bring any peace at all.Romeny just continue to let the people kill their own nation or Romney just bombs on the targets whose property,rights of oils&minerals r to be robbed by 'global' gangs to acceralate the speed of gang robbing. Obama has been shown his ability not to bomb on Syria where such fundamentalistic brain washing oriented gangs. Paul condemend Obama did not bomb on the fundamentalists in Libya.But I would not say Romney would have bombed on the Libyan far-right fundamentalist.Romney may have bombed on Gaddaffi with NATO. I rather would wonder why Paul would not bring the issue of Egypt. I analize the percentage if Obama could do something to MBH. But I conclude that it could not be possible for anyone,including Bush,to intervine to Egypt to stop 'civil' armed violence led by MBH. If Romney would have been attacking on such a huge number of the people brainwashed by far-right fundamentalistic Muslim Brotherhood?No.Romeny would have been attacking on Mubarak gov't,which would only benefit far-right fundamentlist invasion by rasing peoples'hate&violence to own gov't which, correctly for the people's human rights, won't accept fundamentlist/xenophobia nationalism far-right Muslimbrotherhood as a political party. Every nation could be the next.Not only in the middle-east. Obama has been doing the possibly thinkable very best as the American President which bears the critical responsibility for Americans&the world. Pro-US Egypt was fell down because of MBHs ''free'' food/medicine camp! hand down the Arab lands/oil to European companies with European/American/Australian/Cannadian/International far-right share holders. Far-right squeezers are now taking every valuable from every nation/region by rasing violent hate&anger and sending arms to the people to hate their own gov't and kill their own safety to ''invite'' the invader-fundamentalism built in own land by 'own race' to give in to the simply gangs of fundamentlism of xenophobia&nationalism. Who would benefit from the war on own national gov't that fight against Muslim Brotherhood, the combatant fundamentalism? Who would get more dividends from the war in middle-east raised 'by the own people'?Probably highly GOP members of congress. And,who supports Romney?Why? Exactly happened in Africa, some companies in the world, are seeking more minerals/water sources in middle-east by raising anger and hate to kill and demolish the people and property rights. What Muslim brotherhood doing to the people of Egypt is slightly similar to '(Korea)Unity(統一）”which disguises of Christianism but actually is a Korean far-right nationalism/anti-communism combatant gangs stealing/robing money and valuables with armed/non-armed violence and brain-washing. Korean political atmosphere has long been just letting the Unity because of its anti-communism is favoring of the politicians interests to get/collect dirty money or donation from companies by letting such fundamentalist nationalist far-right gangs to bully/attack on left/communism political ideas oriented labor unions. But too much favoring of such fundamentalist gangs may damage the legitimacy of politics itself, which has been a big problem of Korea. Or MBH is similar to '(Japan)Oumu' which disguised buddism/yoga but actually is a far-right nationalism/xenophobia/anti-western culture combatant militant which killed more than 1000 elites as they are representatives of "western-success" and one lawer and his family as they are communism oriented. Far-right milita oumu was/is relatively freely carried out their "activities" of nationalism fundamental brain-washing because certain Japanese politicians favored and benefited from such "anti-communism,which benefits executives of companies not to raise wages. Finally, this year, Japanese Police finally caught and arrested members of oumu. But such political atmosphere similar to that of Korea has been still remaining to let far-right nationalist fundamentalist xenophobia combatant^anti-communist/anti-us/anti-western groups are to be seen as subject to donate or to be obey to its coercive menace of violence/terrorism. Muslim Brotherhood is a cause of violence but is not simply a fundamentalism. Muslim brotherhood is an origin of Jihaad, al-Qaeda, which disguises as if Islamist fundamentalism but actually simply gangs by raising anger/violence with brain washing and Islamist fundamentalism. And its purpose is to let the people kill each other to the extent which demolish/crash their nation/government. The aim is to rob the national property/property rights/mineral rights/water sources and valuables by using the anger/hate of the people themselves. It is all the same to the western fundamentalist Christian far-right combatant hardliner milita gangs disguising Christianism but all are the same in the armed fundamentalism raising anger&hate to kill each other. All the behind of such combatant far-right fundamentalism, always US/Korean/German NGOs who calls themselves as someone for democracy who were arrested for their acts of ignite of riots in Egypt(and in the process of responding to the riots such NGOs ignited, such NGOs urged gov't side's violence).Some of them are being financially organized with members of GOP, according to several media. I am not accusing of GOP itself. But as you see in many countries, it could be said that if far-right combatant anti-communism gangs, such as Korean Unity, or anti-us anti-western far-right nationalist combatant milita gangs such as al-Qaeda, or Japanese Oumu, have been too much favored by certain politicians to gain more interests from companies or to hamper labor union activities, or to gain oil property rights in Africa/the middle-east/Asia, or to sell more arms to such far-right militants/gangs to get more dividends from arm industries, if right -even a centriest who would bomb on Iran where such far-right fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood cannot touch down as a political party-wing hardliner politicians have not been able to stop or wont stop sending arms to such places where hate and anger have been raised by fundamentalist groups of their own race, it would be rather a big mistake of causing such Egypt/Libya/Syria brutal civil armed violence to their own govt that protect their own land/property/rights and lives to hand down and give in to such far-right gangs. I would say, it is not Obamas mistake, but someones mistake to let such far-right combatant groups carry on brain washing to lead the people to involve to violent activities to demolish all valuables of their own nation including proper govt that protects themselves. It is not a mistake of Bush, but of course not of Obama that is so clear for anyone. It could be a mistake of RomneyGOP cause he seems to be part of the series of fundamentalist attacks on any nation no to Muslim brotherhood by using the people of the nation to demolish any valuable mineral rights and property to the extent which kills the people or evacuates by the people themselves. Every nation is being in the apparent existing danger to face up with the Muslim brotherhood or such sort of quasi-inner civil conflict based invasion which exploits the people of the nation to be attacked/demolished in saying-if the nation says no to fundamentalism Muslim Brotherhood or any other fundamentalist anti-us/anti-communism combatant far-right nationalistic militants which always demand of killings of someone who is not beneficial to such fundamentalism violent gangs - Korean Unity/Oumu/al-Quaeda/Natiz..

臨検で武器を取り上げられるベキはシリア暴力至上原理組織テロのアサド大政府破壊の為にシリアへ送られる武器の方だ！

シリアに入り続ける軍事物資が問題でシリアに渡るトルコサウジカタールのテロ物資をテロとの戦いで止めるべき。起きているのはアサド大統領の属するマラウイ族という少数民族虐殺で資源権益を手に入れることができるかのように洗脳するムスリムブラザーフッドの洗脳士の洗脳で一部スンニ派が原理化してのこと。スーダンなど含め、「権益を身体的行動で市民に開放せよ」という「正義」もとにジハードつまり殺しを推奨する目的の為には手段を選ばない一種の暴動至上原理(日本の維新の会や勝手連の報道陣への暴言暴力の示唆に同様の傾向がありそれは中国やイスラエル国内の「投石」という暴力の本来ありうるべからざる「正義」化とおなじながれといっていい。(余談だが、日本の勝手連が、私の「国有化を両国の経済と安定の為に撤回すべき。また自国の領土を敢えて国有化する必要はない」との趣旨をツィートした時は特に反応はなかったが、中国の投石暴力行為に見られるような世界的暴力至上主義原理を非難すると何となく中国の投石を擁護するかの様な反応があったかのようなかんじもある。 勝手連は暴力行為暴力至上主義原理を「行動派」とかすり替え、行動の中身を原理の犯罪問題を明らかに指摘する事を「罪」と捉え「罪」に対してはジハードとの「正義」を行うと称しどんな嘘もデマも嫌がらせも暴力も「正義のため辞さない」と論理のすり替え行う人達が原理洗脳で製造されているのか？とすれば暴力行至上原理の構造はいわゆるオウムやアルカイダだ。そして原理洗脳広告塔4人のうちの一人一見モデル風原理の総会屋を美化するのに必死か。世の中のどの様なまともな政策まともな言論も素晴らしい事も中身空っぽモデル風オミズ総会屋「企業社員」に吸い上げ、企業を根城に日本のアルカイダ資金を日本企業から日夜浄財として吸い上げ、金と「能力」を、モデル風オミズ原理の総会屋広告塔通じ集める一方、あらゆる知性と才能ある側にそのオミズ総会屋テロ系ゆすりやをなすりつける厚かましいやり方。統一教会台湾原理、或いは、スイス拠点にするアーリア人ギャング純潔主義白人至上主義極右資源権益独占原理の送り込む、よくいる企業にウロつくモデル風オミズOL風ヤクザチンピラ「社員」=企業「社員」原理総会屋のみかじめ料強請りを24時間嘘で売り込み日夜熱狂する様できている。 今中東で起きている事は、暴力に資源争いを餌にした中東の原理かとその結果の相打ち皆殺し難民化をイスラム同士でイスラム圏にジューイッシュからスイスに略奪した金と武器で遂行させ、しかも厚かましくそれをイスラエルのせいにする相変わらずキタナイ原理のやり口。 日本の原理(統一教会勝共勝手連など)が原理の資金集めの広告塔を、魅力も才能もない原理統一教会勝共勝手連の暴力原理総会屋モデル風オミズ「社員」に、反原理の人間の才能魅力言えてる表現も考えもスパイ衛星で吸い上げる。魅力ない原理統一教会勝共にスパイ衛星の嘘洗脳催眠術と略奪で人気を集めつつ、原理統一教会勝共勝手連が非難されればその反原理の才能ある側になすりつけるきたなさと同じだ。 反イスラム反イスラエルの資源地上げは、スイスのナチス資金(ジューイッシュから略奪した膨大な金を元に)により、ナチステロをイスラム各国自身によるイスラム原理テロにより行なわれている。 コンゴなどアフリカの自滅煽り資源地上げとアーリア人ギャング純血統至上主義原理による略奪の正当化の為ナチス資金がアフリカに「反政府軍作る」のではなく、中東の場合は、イスラム各国国内で各国政府を脅す国粋民族原理例えばムスリムブラザーフッドなどジハード系イスラム原理暴動テロに資金と武器を流し込み、事実上アフリカと同様資源権益の取り合いをイスラム各国に煽り、「民族のための暴力至上」原理を組織させ、イスラム各国でイスラム原理テロを支持しなければ国内内乱が起きると頃まで脅し、トルコやロンドンのイスラム原理組織、サウジカタールから莫大な資金と武器をシリアのイスラム原理テロ武装組織に送り込み、シリア政府とアラウィ族シリア軍を虐殺している。 国連は機能していないのか？ 非難されるべきはイスラム原理テロであって、シリアを守るアサド大統領シリア政府とシリア軍ではない。 アサド大統領シリア政府とシリア軍これまでスンニ派とも仲良く暮らしてきていた少数市民アラウィ族を殺す事を恰も「正義」にしているのは、選挙制度の確立のなかった事。 だが、すでに4月の時点でアサド大統領シリア政府は7年後の選挙実施を約束しそのための制度整備進める法を議会で可決している。 トルコ首相:「シリア民間機に露企業からの軍需品」と批判 http://mainichi.jp/select/news/20121012k0000e030178000c.html

No transparancy of the state of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant - its unimaginable level of contaminative substances emission./赤旗と朝日新聞英字版でしか報道できない東電発表の福島第一原発の事実 毎時1000万ベクレル セシウム大気流出の現実

日本国民のとりわけ幼児児童特に女児の未来、日本の未来、国益に関わる深刻な事実-福島県民特に児童幼児及び日本国民米国西海岸市民にまで知らされる権利のある重大な事実。 福島第一原発、福島原発事故からの放射性物質の放出はまだ終わっていない。 東電はきちんとそのことを発表しているし、また、多くの数値がその影響はまだまだ福島と日本全土に及んでいることを多くの日本の科学者がきちんと調査し発表している。 がそのことをきちんと発表できる報道機関はなぜか少ない。 国の基本、日本国民市民の人権健康に深くかかわるつまり国益にかかわる事項であるのに、 報道機関が報道できないのはなぜなのか？ 日本の報道機関で報道できたのは（したのは）日本共産党の党機関紙赤旗と朝日新聞英字版だけであるという事実は、日本国民市民が自らの命健康あるいは子供たちの健康甲状腺がんからの予防策を自ら行うためには、日本共産党機関紙赤旗を読むか、英語を真剣にまじめに生き抜くために死ぬ気で勉強するしかないということになる。不思議と、原発利権につながると思われる原理や統一教会が反米反共をその餌にギャング行為詐欺行為を政治に見逃させるという空気を長く温存させていることとその対策は対をなしているようにも思う。 こうなってくると、反米原理組織に親米原理組織に反米、反日本共産党、といわれたら、おかしいぞと思ったほうがいいかもしれない。 なぜなら、人権保障に貢献し世界の軍縮核軍縮国際協調紛争回避の先頭を進むアメリカと対立する根拠が人権保障との観点からいってない。 また人権保障のための政策に極めて熱心で勝紛争回避と国際協調軍縮反暴力反差別で経済政策にもつよくかつ領土問題にもきわめて見識地検のある日本共産党は以前から申し上げているように日本人がもっと自分たちの人権保障生活の質向上に活用すべき政党といえる。資本主義の国だらけの欧州でも長く国粋民族原理ナチス、暴力的略奪至上主義原理の「正当化」に最も強かったのが多くの国の反暴力反差別を標榜し実践する共産主義政党であった事実もあって昔から国粋民族至上主義でない共産主義政党や社会主義政党が政権に加わることは普通にあること。事実イタリアフランスドイツなど欧州資本主義経済大国の人権政策をよりよいものにするために政権に加わって活躍活動することは資本主義国であっても普通のことである。 また、よく労働争議との観点で語られることの多い日本共産党の労働基本権保障生活権保障のための非暴力平和的言論や運動は世界で当然に認められている人権保障の一環であり、欧州の資本主義国のみならず米国においても労働権闘争によるストライキが当然の基本的人権として認められていることからも当然のことで、要するに共産主義資本主義の国であっても人権保障のために政策があり政党がある、ということの基本的枠組みは国際社会の当然必須の基本的枠組みである。そして、共産主義といっても、日本共産党のように人権保障と平和国際協調紛争回避のための多くの合理的人道的政策案をもつ政党を政策競争に特定の政党を除外することは人権保障にとって合理性がないだけでなく、国民の人権福祉経済そして根本的な国益に反するからだ。事実第二次世界大戦にまともに反対した政党は日本共産党だけ。そして現在の社民党の一部経済財閥や企業とともに日本国民が開戦に反対していれば、国際連盟脱退に反対していれば、日本の姿と国際的地位は違っていたことを考えても、日本共産党の反暴力反差別国民の生活と福祉のために税金を使う政策合理性は日本国民が大切に活用する点日本経済人権保障国益に大きくかなう面を多く持つ（日米安保についてのより積極的に国際協調平和的軍縮的自然災害時自然エネルギー食糧水などでの協力への活用政策・日米安保によるテロ国家紛争（国内外）牽制による日本の軍事産業縮小ゼロを実現しさらに進め国家紛争を軍事頼らないアジア太平洋地域を作ってきた（いく）功績などを勘案してもらえばもっと嬉しいにしても）。 さて、というわけで、情報はしんぶん赤旗や朝日新聞はじめ各新聞の英字版は絶対に見逃せない。 また、世界各紙をまんべんなく目を通すと情報を早く多面的に理解できるようになる。もちろん英字新聞だからすべてがまともというわけではないが、読む新聞が多ければ、より自分の考えや論理的分析演繹性を新聞各紙の視点と比べつつ、客観的論理的に人権紛争回避公平性の合理性をもって検証できる蓋然性広がる。 AP、BBC、Telegraph, ABC, PBS, CNN とはいえ、まずは情報に溺れず自分の考えを自分の頭で構成ししっかり持つことが必要だ（といって「自分の頭で考える方法」などと原理や統一教会に洗脳されず、きちんと自説を普段から論理的にもち、かつ、できるだけひろく英字日本語新聞にあたり情報をきちんと論理的に検討し分析することだ）。 Reference ULRs: しんぶん赤旗2012/06/26：http://www.jcpre.com/genpa-fukushima2011-3/2012-06-26gen.html 朝日新聞（英語版）2012/07/24：　http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207240087 朝日新聞（英語版）2012/07/05　http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207050068 ********************************** （以下各社各記事全文引用） （cite from Akahata and Asahishinbunn, please see each URL I cite here)

shibun akahata しんぶん赤旗　2012/06/26付 http://www.jcpre.com/genpa-fukushima2011-3/2012-06-26gen.html 「福島第１ 毎時1000万ベクレルを放出・・原子炉建屋から大気に 　東京電力は6月25日、福島第１原発（福島県大熊町、双葉町）1～３号機の原子炉建屋から大気に放出されている放射性セシウムの量を１時間当たり１０００万ベクレルとみられると発表しました。各原子炉建屋の開□部などで測定した値をもとに推定したもので、この値は前月と同じでした。この放出によって、同原発敷地境界に１年間いた場合の追加被ばく線量は0・02ミリシーベルトになるとしています。 　また、２号機原子炉圧力容器の温度計の故障が相次いでいるなか、東電は外部から温度計を挿入する計画をしていますが、第２候補として考えていたジェットポンプの配管を使った挿入は模擬試験の結果困難であることがわかったと発表しました。第１候補のホウ酸水を注入する配管から挿入する方法について引き続き準備を進めるとともに、そのほかの候補についても検討を進めていると述べました。」

cite from "Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plantradiationdecommissioningcontaminated waterTEPCO", By TAKASHI SUGIMOTO/ Asahi shinbunn Staff Writer, July 24, 2012, shinnbunn English version . "Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plantradiationdecommissioningcontaminated waterTEPCO"By TAKASHI SUGIMOTO/ Staff Writer, Asahishinbunn, July 24, 2012.

"A little more than 500 days after the accident at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant threatened to force the evacuation of the entire Tokyo metropolitan area, the situation is certainly much improved. The levels of cesium being emitted from the damaged reactors have dropped substantially, core temperatures in the pressure vessels are being kept within targeted levels, and the plant operator has started removing unused nuclear fuel assemblies as an experiment. However, workers still must overcome a number of issues to make progress toward decommissioning the reactors at the plant, such as dealing with leaking contaminated cooling water, determining the state of the pressure vessels and removing melted nuclear fuel from the reactor cores. RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS According to calculations by Tokyo Electric Power Co., the operator of the Fukushima No. 1 plant, a total of about 10 million becquerels per hour of radioactive cesium was being emitted from the No. 1 to No. 3 reactors as of June. That is about one-80 millionths of the level that was being spewed immediately after the accident. Achieving a state of cold shutdown has meant a decrease in the volume of cesium emitted from the reactors. Calculating the additional radiation exposure caused by radioactive materials that accumulated on the ground after being emitted from the No. 1 to No. 3 reactors, the combined external and internal radiation exposure level at the main gate of the plant facility about one kilometer from the nuclear plant was 0.02 millisievert over the course of a year. That was considerably below the 1-millisievert level that was used as a goal in determining if a state of cold shutdown had been achieved. However, since February, the level of radiation emitted from the reactors has remained unchanged. "There is the possibility that the cesium that fell on the reactor buildings was stirred up again," said Junichi Matsumoto, acting general director of TEPCO's Nuclear Power and Plant Siting Division. The most radiation is being emitted from the No. 2 reactor, which is releasing 8 million becquerels an hour. The radiation is believed to be leaking from a hole that was made in the wall of the top floor of the reactor building. STATE OF THE REACTOR CORES Meltdowns occurred in the reactor pressure vessels of the No. 1 to No. 3 reactors. According to an analysis by TEPCO, almost all of the melted fuel in the No. 1 reactor has fallen to the bottom of the containment vessel after pouring through the bottom of the pressure vessel. Some of the fuel is also believed to have dropped to the bottom of the containment vessel in the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors. After TEPCO declared last December that a state of cold shutdown had been achieved, it established new safety standards that called for maintaining core temperatures at 80 degrees or less. Because the temperature of the water being pumped into the pressure vessel to cool the nuclear fuel has gone up since summer, the temperature within the pressure vessel has risen slightly to between 35 and 55 degrees. For that reason, equipment was installed from July to cool the water before it is pumped in. At the same time, TEPCO workers are still unable to accurately grasp what the situation is within the pressure vessels. Due to the high temperature and high humidity, cables connected to the thermometers are on the verge of breaking. Half of the 36 thermometers on the pressure vessel of the No. 2 reactor are not displaying accurate temperatures. TEPCO workers are considering the possibility of inserting thermometers directly into the pressure vessel. PROCESSING WATER CONTAMINATED WITH RADIATION Cooling water continues to leak from parts damaged by the accident in the pressure vessels and containment vessels of the No. 1 to No. 3 reactors. Water that has been contaminated with radiation from the melted fuel continues to accumulate in the basements of the reactor buildings and neighboring turbine buildings. The total volume of that contaminated water, including that which has accumulated in nearby buildings, has reached 100,000 tons. Initial plans called for processing all contaminated water by the end of last year. However, several hundreds of tons of groundwater a day is flowing into the buildings and even though about 160,000 tons have been processed, or more than double the initial plan, the processing work is still not complete. Because groundwater continues to leak into the buildings, TEPCO has increased the capacity of the tanks to hold the processed water to a total of 228,000 tons. Plans also call for pumping out groundwater in order to lower the water level. DECOMMISSIONING WORK The central government and TEPCO have begun work toward decommissioning the reactors. The first step will be removing nuclear fuel from the storage pools because that fuel will be easier to remove than the melted fuel in the reactor cores of the No. 1 to No. 3 reactors. The first nuclear fuel will be removed from the No. 4 reactor pool. Not only does that pool have the most fuel, equivalent to what would be used in three to four reactors, but because part of the wall and column of the reactor building was destroyed by a hydrogen explosion, there are concerns about its anti-quake strength. In response, TEPCO has reinforced the bottom of the pool against quakes. "It can withstand a quake of the same level as that of the Great East Japan Earthquake," said TEPCO President Naomi Hirose. However, Ikko Nakatsuka, a Cabinet Office senior vice minister who inspected the No. 4 reactor, touched upon concerns raised by local residents. "While I sufficiently felt the efforts made by everyone involved to bring the accident under control, that has not yet led to a restoration of trust," he said at a meeting in May. On July 18 and 19, TEPCO removed two unused nuclear fuel assemblies as an experiment. If no damage or corrosion is found on the nuclear fuel, full-fledged efforts to remove the fuel will begin in December 2013. The biggest issue will be removing the fuel that has melted. Plans call for beginning that work from 2021 after all fuel has been removed from the storage pools at the No. 1 to No. 4 reactors. However, no decision has yet been made on what specific steps will be taken because not only will that work be unprecedented, but the work will also have to be done in an environment of high radiation levels.-cited from "Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plantradiationdecommissioningcontaminated water TEPCO(By TAKASHI SUGIMOTO/ Asahi shinbunn Staff Writer, July 24, 2012, Asahi Shinbunn English version)"

********************************************************************************* 以下関連記事を同じ朝日新聞英字版から追加引用しました。（cited from "Radioactive river mud threatens lakes, Tokyo Bay", July 05,2012, Asahi shinbun Englishversion, URL: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207050068) Also, a related article about the level of contamination from radioactive substances in Tokyo bay as follows:

Radioactive river mud threatens lakes, Tokyo Bay By TAKASHI SUGIMOTO/Asahishinbunn Staff Writercited from Asahi shinbun English version: July 05, 2012. "Lakes across eastern Japan are being contaminated with radioactive cesium from the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, and scientists are warning of a growing problem in Tokyo Bay. Radioactive mud carried down rivers is slowly accumulating in the lakes, in some cases making fish and shellfish dangerous to eat. In March, a maximum cesium concentration of 9,550 becquerels per kilogram was detected in mud on the bottom of the Bizengawa river, 1.65 kilometers from where it flows into Japan’s second-largest lake, Lake Kasumigaura in Ibaraki Prefecture. A month later, the highest reading was 800 meters closer to the lake and had increased to 9,980 becquerels per kilogram. Hiroshi Iijima, who heads the Asaza Fund nonprofit organization, which conducted the surveys, has asked the central and prefectural governments to put cesium-absorbing zeolites in the lake and set up a temporary dam to stop the mud flowing from the river. Ibaraki Prefecture is known for producing the largest eel catch in Japan. In May, the central government suspended shipments of eels caught in Kasumigaura and other locations in Ibaraki Prefecture after cesium levels exceeding the government standard of 100 becquerels per kilogram for food were detected. In fiscal 2011, cesium levels over 100 becquerels per kilogram were found in fish and shellfish caught in the lake in eight of 71 surveys. The frequency increased to 28 of 87 surveys in the current fiscal year. The prefectural government on April 1 asked fishermen to refrain from shipping three other fish from two rivers and other locations due to high levels of cesium. Since April, cesium levels over 100 becquerels per kilogram have also been found in fish and shellfish in Lake Numazawako, Lake Inawashiroko and Lake Akimotoko in Fukushima Prefecture, Hinuma marsh in Ibaraki Prefecture, Teganuma marsh in Chiba Prefecture and Lake Chuzenjiko in Tochigi Prefecture. “Despite decontamination work, radioactivity could remain in lakes as long as cesium flows in,” an Environment Ministry official said. “While giving priority to decontamination efforts on land, we want to find out to what extent radioactive materials will move to fish through the rivers.” Scientists say freshwater fish tend to retain ingested cesium longer than their saltwater counterparts. They do not discharge as much of the material due to low osmotic pressure between their bodies and surrounding waters. The Environment Ministry found higher cesium concentrations in fish and water insects in lakes and rivers than sea life in a survey in Fukushima Prefecture from December to February. The highest level was 2,600 becquerels per kilogram in a type of rhinogobius in Manogawa river north of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. The concentrations in most saltwater fish were below 100 becquerels. Meanwhile, Yosuke Yamashiki, an associate professor of environmental engineering at Kyoto University, estimates that cesium concentrations at the bottom of Tokyo Bay will peak in 2014 and then remain roughly stable through 2021. His modeling predicts that levels will rise to 300-500 becquerels per kilogram of sand at the bottom of the bay near the mouths of Edogawa and Arakawa rivers in March 2014. Those rivers flow through areas with relatively high radiation levels. Hotspots with cesium levels of 4,000 becquerels per kilogram are possible, Yamashiki said. “Even if no impact of radiation has yet to be found on fish and shellfish, we cannot tell what will happen in the future,” he said. “We need to begin to prevent contamination immediately by reducing the amount of sand flowing into the bay.” Sand containing cesium tends to accumulate in Tokyo Bay because it has a relatively narrow opening to the Pacific Ocean. Yamashiki simulated sand and mud movements in Tokyo Bay and rivers flowing into the bay since March 2011 and used cesium concentrations in soil measured by the government to produce his estimates.(By TAKASHI SUGIMOTO/ Asahishinbunn Staff Writer)"

*cited from Asahishinbunn English version July 05,2012,http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207050068